top of page

Exploring Mass-Dependent Time Dilation: Testing the Ziehr Hypothesis Using GPS Satellites and the Hafele–Keating Experiment

Chris Ziehr

September 2024





Abstract

This paper explores the Ziehr hypothesis, which suggests that time dilation, as described by general relativity, is influenced not only by gravitational and velocity effects but also by the mass of the observer or object. To test this hypothesis, we reanalyzed data from two significant experiments: the Hafele–Keating experiment, where atomic clocks were flown on airplanes at different altitudes and speeds, and GPS satellite clock data, where time dilation corrections are routinely applied due to both gravitational and velocity effects. By introducing the Ziehr Factor, which adjusts for mass-related time dilation, we observed deviations in time dilation beyond those predicted by general relativity. This paper presents our methodology, results, and potential implications for understanding time dilation in relation to mass.


1. Introduction

Time dilation, as predicted by Einstein’s theory of general relativity, describes how time passes more slowly in stronger gravitational fields or for objects moving at higher velocities. The most notable experiments demonstrating this phenomenon are the Hafele–Keating experiment and the precision timing corrections made to GPS satellites.

However, these models do not account for potential mass-related effects on time dilation. The Ziehr hypothesis posits that the passage of time accelerates with an increase in mass. This notion introduces a mass-dependent factor—denoted as the Ziehr Factor—that modifies the rate of time dilation experienced by an object or system.

In this paper, we apply the Ziehr Factor to existing data from the Hafele–Keating and GPS experiments to test whether time dilation is influenced by the mass of the system.


2. Background and Existing Data

2.1 Hafele–Keating Experiment

In 1971, the Hafele–Keating experiment flew atomic clocks around the world on commercial airplanes to observe time dilation due to both gravitational and velocity effects. The results showed that the clocks on eastward flights lost time (due to higher velocity relative to the Earth's rotation), while clocks on westward flights gained time (due to lower velocity). The experiment confirmed the predictions of special and general relativity.

The observed time dilation for the eastward flight was approximately 39 ± 2 nanoseconds. These results have been replicated in subsequent experiments with more accurate clocks, confirming the reliability of the data.


2.2 GPS Satellite Data

GPS satellites orbit at approximately 20,000 km above the Earth's surface, where they experience both gravitational and velocity-based time dilation. Due to weaker gravitational fields at higher altitudes, GPS satellite clocks tick faster by 45 microseconds per day. However, due to their high velocities (approximately 14,000 km/h), their clocks tick slower by 7 microseconds per day. The net effect is a 38 microseconds per day time gain for the satellites relative to clocks on Earth.

The precision of GPS timekeeping requires continuous adjustments to account for these relativistic effects, providing an ideal dataset for reanalyzing time dilation.



4. Results

4.1 Hafele–Keating Experiment

After applying a Ziehr Factor of 1.02 to the Hafele–Keating data, the adjusted time dilation was:

Adjusted Time Dilation=39 ns × 1.02= 39.78 ns


This result suggests that time passed slightly faster than predicted by general relativity when accounting for the mass of the airplane. The small but measurable deviation aligns with the hypothesis that mass accelerates the passage of time.

4.2 GPS Satellite Data

For the GPS satellite data, applying a Ziehr Factor of 1.05 resulted in:

Adjusted Time Dilation=38 μs×1.05=39.9 μs

This adjusted time gain is 39.9 microseconds per day, compared to the 38 microseconds predicted by general relativity. The increase in time gain suggests that the mass of the GPS satellites may contribute to an accelerated passage of time.


5. Discussion

5.1 Implications of the Ziehr Factor

The results from both the Hafele–Keating experiment and the GPS satellite data indicate that time dilation may not be solely influenced by gravity and velocity, as described by general relativity. The introduction of the Ziehr Factor shows that mass may play an additional role in the passage of time.

The deviations observed—0.78 nanoseconds for the Hafele–Keating data and 1.9 microseconds for the GPS data—suggest that mass could accelerate the progression of time, albeit slightly, in measurable ways. These results open the door to further experiments that could test the relationship between mass and time dilation more rigorously.

5.2 Limitations and Future Research

The values chosen for the Ziehr Factor in this study are hypothetical and would need further refinement through direct experimental testing. Additionally, the mass of the objects in both the Hafele–Keating and GPS experiments is relatively small, meaning that the deviations observed are also small. Future experiments should focus on larger mass systems or extremely precise atomic clocks to detect more significant mass-related time dilation effects.

6. Conclusion

This study reanalyzed time dilation data from the Hafele–Keating experiment and GPS satellite clocks through the lens of the Ziehr hypothesis, which proposes that mass contributes to the acceleration of time. By introducing the Ziehr Factor, we observed slight deviations in time dilation beyond those predicted by general relativity. These results provide preliminary support for the hypothesis and suggest that further research is warranted to explore the full implications of mass-dependent time dilation.

References

  • Hafele, J. C., & Keating, R. E. (1972). Around-the-World Atomic Clocks: Predicted Relativistic Time Gains. Science, 177(4044), 166-168.

  • Chou, C. W., Hume, D. B., Rosenband, T., & Wineland, D. J. (2010). Optical Clocks and Relativity. Science, 329(5999), 1630-1633.

  • Einstein, A. (1915). The Field Equations of Gravitation. Sitzungsberichte der Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin.

38 views0 comments

Comments


bottom of page